AnswersStatistical Modeling - Content Recovery - Part BAdditional Principles of Experimental Design

Additional Principles of Experimental Design Answers

10 verified answers1 views
1
Free Preview

A study is testing the effectiveness of a new allergy medication. Sixty volunteers who reported they experience allergies were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one with the new medication, and another with a placebo. After two weeks, the subjects’ level of allergic symptoms was surveyed.

A
The placebo is given to one group of subjects to see if the subjects receiving the placebo experience fewer allergic symptoms than the subjects taking the new medication.
B
The placebo is given to one group of subjects to see if the subjects receiving the placebo experience more allergic symptoms than the subjects taking the new medication.
C
The placebo is given to one group of subjects to see if the subjects receiving the placebo think they have fewer allergic symptoms because they believe they are taking the new medication.
D
The placebo is given to one group of subjects to see if the subjects receiving the new medication think they have fewer allergic symptoms because they believe they are taking the new medication.
2
Free Preview

A farmer learns of a new type of corn that is supposed to have a higher yield of ears. From previous crops, he knows approximately how many ears of corn 10 plants will produce from the original seeds. The farmer decides to plant the new type of corn to determine if the seeds will produce a higher number of ears of corn. He plants the first 100 seeds of the new type of corn seeds in the field he uses for corn. When it is time to harvest, he randomly selects 10 plants and counts the number of ears. The farmer compares the number of ears with the yield he received the previous year from 10 plants using the original corn seeds. Because the new type of corn produced a higher number of ears, he concludes that the new type of corn does produce more ears of corn. Which of the following statements is not true about this experimental design?

A
Because the farmer used the seeds from the top of the packet and did not randomly select the seeds, the conclusion is suspect.
B
Because the farmer used a comparison between the yield of the new type of corn and the yield from the previous corn seeds, the conclusion is valid.
C
There may be other variables that affected the yield of corn between this year’s crop and last year’s crop; therefore, the conclusion would be suspect.
D
Because the farmer did not have two groups growing at the same time, one with the new type of corn and one with the original type of corn, the conclusion may be suspect.
3

A student wants to determine if different types of soil, A and B, affect the propagation of African violets. One hundred leaves from the same variety of African violet were selected. The leaves were then randomly assigned to 50 pots with type A soil and the remaining leaves were put into the 50 pots with type B soil. All of the pots were given the same amount of water and arranged in 10 rows of 10 pots near a window for light. The 50 pots with type A soil were placed closest to the window. At the end of two months, the pots with type A soil had the greatest number of pots with new growth, so the student concluded that soil type A was more effective that soil type B.

A
Yes, because the leaves were randomly assigned, this evenly distributed the variability in the leaves; therefore, type A soil is more effective than type B soil.
B
Yes, because the amount of water and light were controlled, this may have reduced the variability in the response; therefore, type A soil is more effective than type B soil.
C
No, because the pots with type A soil were closest to the window, they received more light, which may have led to the new growth.
D
No, because only African violets were used, replication was not properly implemented; therefore, we cannot conclude that type A soil was more effective.
4

A biology student wanted to determine if using fertilizer would promote plant growth. One hundred plants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one that used the fertilizer, and one that did not use a fertilizer.Which of the following is a benefit of having replication in the experiment?

A
Having a large number of plants receiving the treatments will allow for a good comparison of the differences in plant growth between the two groups.
B
Having a large number of plants receiving the treatments will not allow for a good comparison of the differences in plant growth between the two groups.
C
Replication is not needed in this experiment. One plant receiving each type of treatment is enough to determine if the difference in plant growth is due to the fertilizer.
D
Repeating the experiment will allow the student to compare the differences between the plants that received the fertilizer the first time and the plants that received the fertilizer the second time.
5

A doctor wants to determine if a new medication for cholesterol is more effective than the previous medication. The doctor informs patients of a new medication and asks if they want to participate; 30 patients who are currently taking medication for cholesterol volunteer to be part of the study. She uses random assignment of the 30 patients to two treatment groups: one that uses the new medication, and one that uses the original medication. Which of the following describes the benefit of random assignment?

A
The variability between the medications would be evenly distributed between the two groups, so any observed differences in the cholesterol level between the two groups would more likely be due to the subjects.
B
The variability between the medications would be evenly distributed between the two groups, so any observed differences in the cholesterol level between the two groups would be guaranteed to be due to the subjects.
C
The variability between the subjects would be evenly distributed between the two groups, so any observed differences in the cholesterol level between the two groups would more likely be due to the new medication.
D
The variability between the subjects would be evenly distributed between the two groups, so any observed differences in the cholesterol level between the two groups would be guaranteed to be due to the new medication.
7

A doctor wants to determine if a new medication for cholesterol is more effective than the previous medication. The doctor informed a random selection of his patients of the new medication and asked them if they would like to participate in a drug trial to test the effectiveness of the new cholesterol medicine compared to the current medication. Twenty-five patients who were currently taking medication for cholesterol volunteered and were given the new medication. After two months, the patients’ cholesterol levels are checked.

A
This experiment will show the effectiveness of the new cholesterol medicine.
B
Because the doctor did not have every patient try the new medication, the doctor will not be able to determine the effectiveness of the new medicine.
C
Because the doctor did not have a different random sample of patients take the original medication, the effectiveness of the new medicine will not be able to be determined.
D
Because the doctor did not have a different random sample of patients not take any medication, the effectiveness of the new cholesterol medication will not be able to be determined.
9

A company that manufactures golf balls produces a new type of ball that is supposed to travel significantly farther than the company’s previous golf ball. To determine this, 40 new-style golf balls and 40 original-style golf balls are randomly selected from the company’s production line on a specific day. The balls are then placed in a bag and shaken. A golf pro then selects a ball and hits it. The distance the ball travels is then measured. The bag is shaken again, and the golf pro selects another ball to hit. She continues this procedure until all 80 of the golf balls are hit.

A
Yes, because the balls are randomly selected, the distances of the new ball can be compared to the distances of the original ball.
B
Yes, because the original ball type is included in this experiment, the distances the different balls travel can be accurately compared.
C
No, because a placebo ball was not used, a comparison cannot be made to determine if the new ball travels significantly farther.
D
No, because all of the new type of balls are not hit first, the distances they travel cannot be compared to the distances of the original ball.
10

A biology student wanted to determine if using fertilizer would promote plant growth. One hundred plants were randomly assigned to one of two groups as shown in the design web.Which of the following accurately describes the benefit of comparison in the experiment shown in the design web?

Question illustration
A
There is no need for comparison in this experiment.
B
The overall growth of the plants can be compared to see which plants benefit the most from fertilizer.
C
The growth of the plants in the treatment group only can be compared to see if the fertilizer had a significant effect.
D
The growth of plants in the treatment group and the control group can be compared to see if the fertilizer had a significant effect.

Did you find these answers helpful?