AnswersCA-Expository Reading and Writing BComparing Argument Techniques in Two Speeches

Comparing Argument Techniques in Two Speeches Answers

7 verified answers2 views
1
Free Preview

Which statement summarizes the claim that Wallace makes in his speech?

A
Southerners, like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, are the Founding Fathers of the United States.
B
Alabama has the right to continue policies of racial segregation.
C
Alabama has a proud tradition of religious and racial freedom.
D
Many people in New England, the West, and the Midwest have Southern roots.
2
Free Preview

What did you include in your response? Check all that apply.

A
Wallace’s appeal to emotion (pathos)
B
Wallace’s appeal to logic (logos)
C
Wallace’s appeal to morals and credibility (ethos)
D
how the rhetorical appeal supported the claim
3

What evidence does Wallace use to support his claim that Alabama has the right to continue policies of racial segregation?

A
He refers to the Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which declared the segregation of schools for Black and White students was unconstitutional.
B
He uses the Jim Crow laws, which established racial segregation of schools, restaurants, bathrooms, water fountains, and other public places.
C
He refers to the freedom to continue racial segregation based on the states’ rights in the US Constitution.
D
He quotes Rudyard Kipling, who said the Southland has the greatest fighting breed of man in all the world.
5

Which argument technique does Wallace use most effectively in this passage?

A
appeal to ethos
B
appeal to pathos
C
repetition
D
appeal to logos
6

Which techniques does Wallace use in this passage? Check all that apply.

A
appeal to ethos
B
appeal to pathos
C
appeal to logos
D
repetition
E
factual evidence
7

Explain how Wallace uses one of the three rhetorical appeals to support the claim that Alabama has the right to continue policies of racial segregation.

Answer:

George Wallace uses the rhetorical appeals of ethos and logos to support his claim that Alabama has the right to continue policies of racial segregation. He uses logos by referencing the legal structure of the U.S. Constitution, arguing that because the federal government is not explicitly granted the power to regulate social policies like segregation, that power remains with the states. He also uses ethos by framing his position as a defense of the founding fathers' original intent and the moral authority of state sovereignty. By positioning himself as a protector of constitutional liberty against federal overreach, he attempts to give his argument legal and moral credibility.

Did you find these answers helpful?