AnswersVT-ACT ReadingDiagnostic PreTest

Diagnostic PreTest Answers

87 verified answers3 views
42
Free Preview

Read the excerpt from "Politics and the English Language" by George Orwell.In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible. Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. . . . Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them. Consider for instance some comfortable English professor defending Russian totalitarianism. He cannot say outright, "I believe in killing off your opponents when you can get good results by doing so.” Probably, therefore, he will say something like this:While freely conceding that the Soviet regime exhibits certain features which the humanitarian may be inclined to deplore, we must, I think, agree that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of transitional periods, and that the rigors which the Russian people have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement.

A
Orwell lists statistics to support the underlined claim.
B
Orwell quotes an article with examples of cloudy language.
C
Orwell provides a hypothetical situation with someone using unclear language.
D
Orwell lists facts to prove that most newspapers use puzzling language.
43

What features of the passage identify it as using a cause-and-effect structure? Select three options.

A
The first sentence lists specific conditions followed by what might eventually happen.
B
The first sentence uses the expressions “on the one hand” and “on the other hand.”
C
The second sentence starts with the expression “for this reason.”
D
The second sentence lists potential consequences of the situation described.
E
The second sentence describes the citizens of the conquered city.
45

Read the excerpt from The Odyssey.Then I sent out two picked men and a runnerto learn what race of men that land sustained. They fell in, soon enough, with Lotus-Eaters,who showed no will to do us harm, onlyoffering the sweet Lotus to our friends—but those who ate this honeyed plant, the Lotus,never cared to report, nor to return:they longed to stay forever, browsing on that native bloom, forgetful of their homeland.

A
The men sent by Odysseus to investigate the land they had landed upon became forgetful after eating Lotus plants.
B
The Lotus-Eaters meant no harm and simply offered the Lotus plant to Odysseus’s men as a gesture of kindness.
C
The Lotus was a sweet plant that made men forget everything except the idea of obtaining and eating more Lotus plants.
D
The men sent ashore by Odysseus were swayed by the hospitality of the Lotus-Eaters and abandoned the idea of returning home.
55

Read this passage from chapter 5 of The Prince.And he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. And whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as Pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the Florentines.

A
Machiavelli identifies the problem of the Florentines holding Pisa after conquest and offers the solution of disuniting the city to keep it.
B
Machiavelli uses reasoning and an example as evidence in an argumentative structure to support his claim that a prince must destroy a city that is accustomed to freedom if he wants to hold it.
C
Machiavelli uses a compare-and-contrast structure to contrast a city that rebels with one that does not, thus supporting his central idea that a prince must destroy a city that is accustomed to freedom.
D
Machiavelli identifies freedom as a cause of rebellion in a conquered city and describes how the new prince can subdue the rebellion by destroying the city.

Did you find these answers helpful?