Which examples signal potential bias in a source about the benefits of eating more sugar? Check all that apply.The writer’s research was sponsored by a corn syrup (sugar) lobby.The writer says, “The thought of giving up sugar makes me want to cry.” The writer cites a study showing that sugar is a source of short-term energy.The writer includes an interview with an expert in nutritional science.The writer fails to mention that the FDA recommends limiting sugar intake. The writer claims that sugary treats are the high point of most people’s days.
Answer
A
The writer’s research was sponsored by a corn syrup (sugar) lobby.
B
The writer says, “The thought of giving up sugar makes me want to cry.”
C
The writer cites a study showing that sugar is a source of short-term energy.
D
The writer includes an interview with an expert in nutritional science.
E
The writer fails to mention that the FDA recommends limiting sugar intake.
F
The writer claims that sugary treats are the high point of most people’s days.
Explanation
A sugar-industry sponsor may have a financial interest in making sugar look beneficial. The writer’s emotional reaction and broad claim that sugary treats are the high point of most people’s days suggest personal preference or persuasive language rather than neutral reporting. Leaving out the FDA’s recommendation to limit sugar also omits important information that could challenge the source’s message. Citing a study or interviewing a nutrition expert does not, by itself, signal bias.
AI-written and checked against the verified answer.