AnswersAZ-US History ARatification and the Bill of Rights

Marshall’s Court Answers

10 verified answers2 views
1
Free Preview

In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could regulate

Answer not available
2
Free Preview

The power to establish a national bank is

A
an express power of the judicial branch.
B
an implied power of the executive branch.
C
an implied power of Congress.
D
an express power of Congress.
3

The Supreme Court case Gibbons v. Ogden was related to

A
local rights.
B
business rights.
C
employment rights.
D
voting rights.
4

How did the 1803 ruling in Marbury v. Madison affect the balance of power in the federal government?

A
It made the executive branch stronger than the other branches.
B
It gave the executive branch a way to check the power of the Supreme Court.
C
It gave the judicial branch a way to check the power of Congress.
D
It made the judicial branch stronger than the other branches.
5

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress

A
can establish state banks.
B
has no implied powers.
C
can establish a national bank.
D
has only express powers.
6

An example of commerce that would be regulated by the federal government is

A
a ferry that takes passengers from New York to New Jersey.
B
a bakery that sells homemade bread in Texas.
C
a company that rents paddle boats on a lake in Florida.
D
a bus that takes passengers between two towns in Missouri.
7

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that

A
Gibbons’s federal license allowed him to operate in multiple states.
B
Ogden’s license could not operate an interstate business.
C
Ogden could not compete with Gibbons in interstate commerce.
D
Gibbons and Ogden had to work together to operate in two states.
8

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that state law

A
could create a state bank.
B
could not override federal law.
C
required the federal bank to pay taxes.
D
was constitutional.
9

In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court ruled that in business disputes

A
federal law always supercedes state law.
B
the application of federal or state law depends on the issue.
C
state law can supercede federal law in special cases.
D
state law always supercedes federal law.
10

A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states

A
must not interfere with commerce between individuals.
B
must apply national law to commerce within their borders.
C
could prohibit any commerce within their borders.
D
could regulate commerce only within their borders.

Did you find these answers helpful?

Marshall’s Court Answers — AZ-US History A