Explain how and why natural selection has allowed species such as sharks and alligators to remain genetically stable for thousands of years.
These species have experienced long-term stabilizing selection; individuals with extreme phenotypes are selected against, keeping the population near an already-optimal mean and producing little net genetic change over time.
What distinguishes disruptive and directional selection pressures when both select for extreme genetic traits?
Directional selection favors only one phenotypic extreme and shifts the population mean; disruptive selection favors both extremes and can split the population into two divergent groups.
Among humans more boys are born than girls, but women have significantly higher life expectancies. What is the significance of this?
The higher male birth rate is offset by higher male mortality, resulting in an approximately 1:1 sex ratio among reproductive-age adults.
Contrast disruptive and stabilizing selections.
While stabilizing selection selects for the most common, normal traits in a population, disruptive selection selects for extremes. Disruptive selection eliminates the very intermediate traits that stabilizing selection preserves.
Explain why random distribution patterns for species are the rarest in nature.
Resources and conditions in nature are rarely uniform, so organisms tend to cluster around favorable patches or space themselves regularly through interactions; truly random placement is therefore uncommon.
Did you find these answers helpful?