AnswersStatisticsScope of Inference

Scope of Inference — Quiz Answers

10 verified answers
1
Free Preview

Using this dotplot and the difference in proportions from the samples, is there convincing evidence that the new additive was more effective?

A
Yes, because a difference in proportions of 0 point 2 or more occurred 41 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is statistically significant and the new additive is more effective.
B
No, because a difference in proportions of 0 point 2 or more occurred 41 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is not statistically significant and the new additive is not more effective.
C
Yes, because a difference in proportions of 0 point 2 or less occurred 159 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is statistically significant and the new additive is more effective.
D
No, because a difference in proportions of 0 point 2 or less occurred 159 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is not statistically significant and the new additive is not more effective.
2
Free Preview

Using the dotplot and the difference in mean distances from the samples, is there convincing evidence that the new golf ball travels farther than the original golf ball?

A
No, because a difference in mean distances of 4 point 9 feet or more occurred 6 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence the new golf ball travels farther than the original golf ball.
B
Yes, because a difference in mean distances of 4 point 9 feet or less occurred 194 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence the new golf ball travels farther than the original golf ball.
C
No, because a difference in mean distances of 4 point 9 feet or less occurred 194 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence the new golf ball travels farther than the original golf ball.
D
Yes, because a difference in mean distances of 4 point 9 feet or more occurred only 6 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence the new golf ball travels farther than the original golf ball.
3

Which of the following is a valid conclusion?

A
It cannot be concluded that the new additive did not cause the extended life of the cut flowers, and this inference can only be applied to the carnations from the greenhouse.
B
It can be concluded that the new additive caused the extended life of the cut flowers, and this inference can only be applied to the carnations from the greenhouse.
C
It can be concluded that the new additive did not cause the extended life of the cut flowers, and this inference can be applied to all carnations.
D
It can be concluded that the new additive caused the extended life of the cut flowers, and this inference can be applied to all carnations.
4

Using the dotplot and sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false?

A
Yes, because a proportion of 0 point 4 5 or more occurred 87 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
B
No, because a proportion of 0 point 4 5 or more occurred 87 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
C
Yes, because a proportion of 0 point 4 5 or less occurred only 16 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
D
No, because a proportion of 0 point 4 5 or less occurred 16 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
5

Using the dotplot and the difference in mean ratings from the samples, is there convincing evidence that the one detergent is better than the other?

A
No, because a difference in mean rating of negative 2 point 3 or more occurred 195 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is not statistically significant, and there is not convincing evidence that one brand is better than the other.
B
No, because a difference in mean rating of negative 2 point 3 or less only occurred 5 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that one brand is better than the other.
C
Yes, because a difference in mean rating of negative 2 point 3 or less occurred only 5 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is statistically significant, and there is convincing evidence that cap b is more effective than cap A .
D
Yes, because a difference in mean rating of negative 2 point 3 or less occurred only 5 out of 200 times, meaning the difference is statistically significant, and there is convincing evidence that cap A is more effective than cap b .
7

Using the dotplot and the proportion of winners in the store owner’s sample, is there convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is wrong?

A
No, because a proportion of 0 point 4 or more occurred 25 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
B
Yes, because a proportion of 0 point 4 or less occurred 75 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
C
No, because a proportion of 0 point 4 or less occurred 75 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
D
Yes, because a proportion of 0 point 4 or more occurred 25 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
8

Using the dotplot and sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false?

A
No, because a proportion of 0 point 4 0 or more occurred 98 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
B
No, because a proportion of 0 point 4 0 or less occurred 2 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
C
Yes, because a proportion of 0 point 4 0 or more occurred 98 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
D
Yes, because a proportion of 0 point 4 0 or less occurred only 2 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of red marbles is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the teacher’s claim is false.
9

Using the dotplot and the sample mean mileage, is there convincing evidence that the new type of tread improves the mileage?

A
Yes, because a mean mileage of 52,000 or more occurred only 7 out of 200 times, the mean mileage is statistically significant. There is convincing evidence the new type of tire tread improves mileage of the tire.
B
No, because a mean mileage of 52,000 or less occurred 193 out of 200 times, the mean mileage is not statistically significant. There is not convincing evidence the new type of tire tread improves mileage of the tire.
C
Yes, because a mean mileage of 52,000 or less occurred 193 out of 200 times, the mean mileage is statistically significant. There is convincing evidence the new type of tire tread improves mileage of the tire.
D
No, because a mean mileage of 52,000 or more occurred 7 out of 200 times, the mean mileage is not statistically significant. There is not convincing evidence the new type of tire tread improves mileage of the tire.
10

Using the dotplot and the proportion of winners in Jack’s sample, is there convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is wrong?

A
No; because a proportion of 0 occurred 3 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
B
No; because a proportion more than 0 occurred 97 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is not statistically significant and there is not convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
C
Yes; because a proportion of 0 occurred 3 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.
D
Yes; because a proportion of more than 0 occurred 97 out of 100 times, the sample proportion of winners is statistically significant and there is convincing evidence that the manufacturer’s claim is false.

Did you find these answers helpful?

Scope of Inference — Quiz Answers — Statistics