AnswersCommon Core ELA 10A-ICWriting a Narrative Essay about Being Judged

Sugar Changed the World, Part 5: Developing and Refining Ideas Answers

0 verified answers1 views
1
Free Preview

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Underneath the clash over rights, laws, and work rules, there was a deeper truth that the planters were sensing: The Age of Sugar was ending. On the one hand, the work on the plantations was now guided by a web of laws and rules that even an Indian coolie like Bechu could use to challenge the owners. Workers were individuals, not property. On the other hand, world sugar prices were plummeting. Owners no longer had the economic clout of being a mainstay of the economy. Instead, smaller plantations were going bankrupt. The old ways were simply not working anymore. Why were sugar prices falling? Because of competition from another part of the world.

A
empirical evidence showing that sugar prices were plummeting all over the world.
B
logical evidence showing that sugar farming was changing because of laws and low prices.
C
ethical evidence showing that the drop in sugar prices was forcing smaller plantations to go bankrupt.
D
anecdotal evidence showing that smaller plantations were losing money and going bankrupt.
2
Free Preview

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.A fire was lit in a giant iron cauldron, and the certificates of 2,300 Indians were tossed into the flames—the first major act of Satyagraha. "I am not property," the Indians were showing. "I am not your victim," they were demonstrating. "I have the power of my conscience," they were proving. The quiet strength of the Indian community shook the South African government. And by June 1914 it gave in; the Black Act was taken off the books. The Indians had insisted that they were not mere workers but were citizens—and finally the government could not resist.

A
The burning of certificates and the repeal of the Black Act show that the Indians reclaimed their power.
B
The Black Act shows that the South African government saw the Indians as property.
C
The burning of certificates and the act of Satyagraha show how the Indians had to comply with the Black Act.
D
The presence of 2,300 Indians shows that the community in South Africa was large enough to revolt.
3

Which question should a reader ask to identify an author's purpose?

A
Why did the author write this text?
B
What evidence does the author provide?
C
What is the author's opinion on this topic?
D
How effective is the evidence?
4

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.And yet, for all the hardships and prejudice, most Indians decided to stay in the colonies even after their contracts ended. By the end of the 1800s, only a quarter of the indentures sailed back to India after their five years were over. Sometimes this was because they were still too poor. Others told tales of returning only to be spurned by their villages for having broken caste or to be preyed upon by relatives who stole their money. Most of those who stayed in the New World, though, chose to do so because it offered a new life. And in the late 1800s, the authorities began to make a new offer to Indian workers. If they remained in the Caribbean, they could get a small plot of land of their own. After putting in their time in sugar, they could begin to farm for themselves.

A
the goal of explaining why the majority of Indians stayed in the colonies
B
the goal of showing why Indians were rejected by their home villages
C
the goal of showing the prejudice Indians faced in the Caribbean
D
the goal of explaining the terms of the Indians’ indenture contracts
5

What is an author's claim?

A
an author's primary reason for writing a text
B
a belief that is easily proved to be correct
C
an opinion or viewpoint in a persuasive text
D
a judgement of something based on a set of standards
6

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Mohandas K. Gandhi (later known as the Mahatma or Great One) was born in India to a traditional Hindu family. When he was given the opportunity to study law in England, he faced the same problem as the indentured sugar workers: He would lose caste if he crossed the black water. His family arranged a special ceremony that allowed him to make the trip without giving up his place in society. Thus, in 1894, freshly educated in England, Gandhi made a second journey. He began practicing law in Natal, a region in what is now South Africa. He moved there because many Indians were already in Natal, laboring as indentured sugar workers.One day, Gandhi later explained, "a man in tattered clothes, headgear in hand, two front teeth broken and his mouth bleeding, stood before me trembling and weeping." The indentured worker, whose name was Balasumdaram, had been badly beaten by his employer. Gandhi knew that Balasumdaram was trapped. For no matter how poorly he had been treated by his boss, if he left the plantation, he could be prosecuted and jailed. Gandhi saw indenture for what it was: "almost as bad as slavery. Like the slave the indentured labourer was the property of his master."

A
The evidence explains that Gandhi would lose caste if he traveled across the black water.
B
The evidence indicates that Gandhi wanted to live where he could interact with sugar workers.
C
The evidence shows that Gandhi felt sorry for a man who approached him weeping.
D
The evidence details how Gandhi saw a man who had been beaten and knew that the man could not leave.
7

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Workers could not leave the plantation unless they had a pass. And if they did decide to explore on their own, without permission, they could be thrown in jail, sentenced to hard labor, or lose some of their hard-earned wages. A charge of "idling" in the fields could result in the loss of a whole week's wages. Worse, if they dared rebel or protest, their contract could be transferred to another estate. And there were still complaints of flogging or mysterious deaths. Life, as the historian Hugh Tinker noted, was like being a prisoner on parole.

A
Who was Hugh Tinker, and what did he study?
B
What did the Indians’ contracts specify?
C
What was life actually like for indentured Indians?
D
What kind of work did the Indians do on plantations?
8

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.The Indian coolies and the ex-slaves, who resented these newcomers flooding into the colonies and driving down wages, were instant rivals. This was convenient for the planters—who were skilled at the game of divide and rule. The planters lumped their workers into two distinct but equally nasty stereotypes: Former slaves were described as lazy, whereas Indians were called meek, docile children. "You may have work and plenty of it for a black man and a coloured man, and they will not do it,” claimed planter W. Alleyne Ireland. He conveniently ignored the fact that the ex-slaves wanted to work their own land, not labor for their former owners. The overseers praised the Indians' meekness but also held them in contempt. The Indian, one overseer claimed, "possesses the low, cringing and abject habit common to his nationality."

A
anecdotal evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people were paid wages on different scales
B
empirical evidence that planters ignored the fact that formerly enslaved people wanted to work their own land
C
empirical evidence that planters tried to pit formerly enslaved people against Indian workers to the planters’ advantage
D
logical evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people did not get along with one another because wages went down
9

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.Indians were supposed to work seven hours each day, and to be paid a set fee for each day's work. But the planters instead preferred to pay by the "task''—they insisted that they wouldn't pay a worker until he had completed a specific job. Of course the owner would pick a job that took much more than seven hours, so a worker's day stretched from sunup to sundown. Bechu showed that this was illegal and unfair: "There are lots of indentured men who work by time and have drivers at their backs all day long." Yet, even then, they "do not earn'' the amount specified in their contracts.Several planters wrote back to the paper, furious at the suggestion that they were cheating the coolies. The letters were black with rage—at the Indian who dared to speak up and question the ethics of Englishmen. When a commission was convened in 1897 to investigate the conditions on the estates, Bechu—the Indian the planters hated—came before the judges to share his evidence.

A
to inform the reader about the daily routines and tasks of workers on the sugar plantations
B
to inform the reader about Bechu’s role in proving that the plantation owners’ tactics were illegal
C
to inform the reader that certain jobs on the plantation took too long to be finished in one day
D
to inform the reader that Bechu was powerless over his bosses, despite sharing his evidence
10

Which type of evidence would most likely include a testimonial?

A
empirical
B
logical
C
ethical
D
anecdotal

Did you find these answers helpful?