14
QuizMultiple Choice

The Civil War in Georgia (Part I)

Question 14 • LPS US History I (CR) - MP2

What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?

Answer
A
He was free because he had lived in free states.
B
He was free because he owned property.
C
He should not have been captured because he was a fugitive.
D
He should get his property back through due process.

Explanation

Dred Scott argued that he should be legally free because he had lived with his enslaver in places where slavery was prohibited. His case sought recognition of his freedom; it was not based on owning property or on a claim that he was a fugitive.

AI-written and checked against the verified answer.

Previous
Next