How does Keeler use logic in this passage?
Keeler deals mainly with the Pilgrims while Bruchac discusses immigrants who came later.Keeler deals with specific Europeans while Bruchac discusses general immigrant groups.
Keeler uses more poetic language.Keeler uses an argument that appeals to facts and emotions.
Keeler looks toward the future while Bruchac looks at the past.Keeler demands the return of Native American lands while Bruchac believes they’ve been returned.
Did you find these answers helpful?