AnswersCareers in Criminal Justice 1 A Introduction ISUnit 3: US Laws: Freedom versus Responsibility

Unit 3: US Laws: Freedom versus Responsibility Answers

10 verified answers1 views
3

A drunk driver has just been convicted of hitting and killing a pedestrian walking home from work. Not satisfied with the three-year jail sentence handed down by the court, the family of the victim decides to sue the driver for money. Is this legal?

A
Yes, but only if the family sues the driver in criminal court.
B
Yes, but only if the family sues the driver in civil court.
C
No, this is a violation of the double jeopardy clause.
D
No, this is a violation of the Sixth amendment.
4

Carlos, a Florida native, was sitting on his couch watching television when he heard a knock at the door. On the other side were two police officers demanding to search his home for stolen goods. Although Carlos knew that he didn’t steal or possess any stolen items, he was afraid to let them in. Can Carlos refuse to let the offers inside?

A
No, police officers have the right to enter any home they wish.
B
No, when stolen things are involved, the police override other laws.
C
Yes, if the police don’t have a warrant, Carlos does not have to allow entry.
D
Yes, the police can’t enter, even with a warrant signed by a judge.
5

The rights of US citizens are set forth in the:

A
Supremacy clause.
B
Bill of Rights.
C
Constitution.
D
Federal code.
6

A criminal defense attorney is scouring over a case file in the hopes he will find evidence that his client is innocent of the crime for which he is being charged. After looking at a medical evaluation, he decided to claim innocence based on a lack of evidence related to Mens Rea. What does this mean?

A
The attorney doesn’t think there is proof that a crime was even committed.
B
The attorney doesn’t think there is proof that his client actually committed the crime.
C
The attorney doesn’t think there is proof that his client acted alone during the crime.
D
The attorney doesn’t think there is proof that his client was in his right state of mind at the time.
7

Caleb is on trial for theft. His lawyer has submitted a motion to suppress evidence. What is the attorney trying to accomplish by filing this motion?

A
He is trying to get the judge to look at new evidence during the trial.
B
He is trying to get the judge to block the admittance of certain evidence.
C
He is trying to obtain permission to search for new case evidence.
D
He is trying to find evidence that proves his client is guilty.
8

Which amendment guarantees citizens a fair and speedy trial?

A
Second Amendment
B
Fourth Amendment
C
Fifth Amendment
D
Sixth Amendment

Did you find these answers helpful?

Unit 3: US Laws: Freedom versus Responsibility…