What is one ideal stated in the preamble of the Constitution?
Which statement best describes the preamble of the Constitution?
Read the text of the 14th Amendment.All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.–14th Amendment
Read the scenario.A person writes a social media post urging fellow protesters to loot stores and destroy property as they march through a town.
Read the scenario.Sheree is watching her favorite detective show. The fictional detective knocks on a suspect’s door and asks to come in to look around. The suspect refuses.
What is an amendment?
What is vertical reading?
What is a characteristic of a reliable fact-checking site?
How does Article V affect the laws outlined in the US Constitution?
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens against
Why is it important to use the strategy of lateral reading?
What is one potential problem when using wikis as a fact-check source?
Which event is an example of the principle of checks and balances?
What is one right granted by the 14th Amendment?
Read the summary of the Harper v. Board of Elections Supreme Court case.Annie Harper could not afford to pay her Virginia state poll tax of $1.50. She filed a lawsuit claiming that the poll tax denied poor residents of their rights under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. In a 6–3 decision, the court ruled in 1966 that poll taxes did go against the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. The decision outlawed the use of poll taxes in all state and local elections.
Which section of the Constitution names the powers of the president?
Read this summary of the Katz v. United States Supreme Court case.In 1965, a man named Charles Katz was suspected of sending gambling information over the phone to clients in other states, which is against federal law. Without obtaining a warrant, the FBI put a recording device on the public telephone booth Katz used. The recorded evidence led to his conviction. However, Katz challenged it on the grounds of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Supreme Court ruled in Katz’s favor. The court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to recording devices, too. The justices based their decision on the idea that the law protects people and that Katz had an expectation of privacy when he entered the telephone booth.
Read the scenario.Three friends eat lunch together every day at their public middle school. One friend is Jewish, one is Muslim, and one is Christian. Each friend says a prayer before eating.
The right to assemble is the right to
What is a warrant?
Did you find these answers helpful?