AnswersRKAA- Common Core English 10 1.0Writing a Research-Based Argumentative Essay about a Debatable Topic

Writing a Research-Based Argumentative Essay about a Debatable Topic Answers

10 verified answers
1
Free Preview

Read the claim and reason.Beginning in high school, students should earn their own money by finding after-school employment. An after-school job serves not only as income, but as valuable experience for when students leave school for the workforce.Read the counterclaim and reason.While having a source of income can certainly be a learning experience for high school students, they should maintain their focus on academics and extracurricular activities. Working after school, many experts agree, ca

T
The rebuttal should include examples of jobs that are available to students and the problems associated with those jobs.
T
The rebuttal should acknowledge that school remains a priority and discuss the benefits of a balance between school and work.
T
The rebuttal should address the need for a discussion on the matter by restating both points before reaching a conclusion.
T
The rebuttal should state a logical explanation for both opinions before granting credibility to the need for school to remain a priority.
3

best

A
A counterclaim states both a reason and evidence to support a claim, which a rebuttal rejects to show a second opinion about the claim.
A
A counterclaim states the limitations of the central claim, which a rebuttal acknowledges and clarifies using evidence to support the claim.
A
A counterclaim states another version of the central claim, which a rebuttal compares to the original claim.
A
A counterclaim states an opposing viewpoint to the claim, which a rebuttal fairly and logically addresses.
4

Read the claim.School uniforms diminish students’ individuality and creativity and have no place in the school system.Which evidence best supports the claim? Select two options.A student’s choice of clothing is protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, since dress is a form of expression.A University of Houston study found that girls’ language test scores rose by about 3 percent after uniforms were introduced.Students at high schools across the nation struggle daily with the decision of what to wear, a decision that plagues adults as well.The enforcement of uniforms contradicts the ideas presented in the schools about freedom fighters like Susan B. Anthony.One recent study found that school uniforms had no effect on behavioral issues, but they had a negative effect on academic performance.

A
A student’s choice of clothing is protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, since dress is a form of expression.
B
A University of Houston study found that girls’ language test scores rose by about 3 percent after uniforms were introduced.
C
Students at high schools across the nation struggle daily with the decision of what to wear, a decision that plagues adults as well.
D
The enforcement of uniforms contradicts the ideas presented in the schools about freedom fighters like Susan B. Anthony.
E
One recent study found that school uniforms had no effect on behavioral issues, but they had a negative effect on academic performance.
5

Read the claim and reason.The US government should pass legislation to alleviate the challenges of student-loan debt faced by millions of Americans. Most young adults who are leaving college with a bachelor’s degree are entering the workforce with extensive student loans to pay off.Read the counterclaim and reason.Student-loan debt is not a problem the government needs to address further. More than half of young adults already receive assistance with repayment of student loans.

T
The rebuttal should restate the idea that young adults receive assistance to pay off their loans, then provide evidence showing exactly how much assistance they receive.
T
The rebuttal should address the idea that the government doesn't need to deal with student loan debt, using reasoning to explain the counterclaim’s limitations.
T
The rebuttal should find and state a balance between the claim and the counterclaim, using additional evidence to support both sides.
T
The rebuttal should contradict the counterclaim by dismissing its effectiveness, then address the flaws in the reason by using a call to action.
7

best

A
All evidence should be reliable and varied, using personal experiences only when relevant.
A
All evidence should be empirical and scientifically proven in order to be more persuasive.
A
All evidence should be open to multiple interpretations to strongly support counterclaims.
A
All evidence should be created by the writer to avoid the repetition and overuse of evidence.
8

Read the passage from an argumentative essay.Many endangered species are currently threatened by climate change. There are some laws already in place, but are they effective enough? Anyone with a conscience knows that these creatures deserve the chance to survive without outside threats impeding their survival. I suppose this is a tough decision for lawmakers, but I hope they choose wisely.

T
The claim is ineffective because the language used is unclear and the reasoning does not strongly support it.
T
The claim is unsuccessful because most people will not agree with the opinion and reasoning stated in the claim.
T
The claim is logical because it makes sense and the reasoning used to support it is plausible, varied, and effective.
T
The claim is compelling because there is variety in the supporting evidence and the call to action is powerful.
9

Which best defines a logical fallacy?

a
an error in reasoning
c
credit given to an author for his or her ideas
a
an opposing argument
e
evidence based on scientific research
10

Read the claim.Human bodies have developed over time to support a vegetarian diet.Read the counterclaim. Humans have eaten meat along with plants for more than two million years, contributing to our successful evolution.Read the rebuttal.Evolution is the process of development over history, meaning that change in diet is constant.

I
It is effective because it creates emphasis by adding reasoning to the claim.
I
It is effective because it provides both empirical and logical supporting evidence.
I
It is ineffective because it does not address or acknowledge the counterclaim.
I
It is ineffective because it does not logically point out a flaw in the counterclaim.

Did you find these answers helpful?