Nature and the Environment — Test Answers

25 verified answers2 views
21
Free Preview

Which best describes one main difference between Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring and Winona LaDuke’s "A Case for Waawaatesi"?

A
Carson believes that the past was just as bad as the present, while LaDuke believes that the present is worse than the past.
B
Carson speaks of a possible future, while LaDuke discusses only what has happened in the past.
C
Carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while LaDuke is only concerned about a certain part of the environment.
D
Carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while LaDuke appeals to readers’ emotions.
23

Read this sentence from Silent Spring . Along the roads, laurel, viburnum and alder, great ferns and wildflowers delighted the traveler's eye through much of the year. Read the excerpt from A Case for Waawaatesi. It turns out that being dark part of the time is a good idea for animals, and for ourselves. That’s the way it’s supposed to be. Which best states a comparison of the tones used in these excerpts?

A
Both excerpts are despairing, but the first excerpt has a gloomier tone.
B
Both excerpts are negative, but the second excerpt has a more negative tone.
C
Both excerpts are positive, but the first excerpt has a more serious tone.
D
Both excerpts are uplifting, but the second excerpt is more conversational in tone.
24

Which best compares the structure of Silent Spring and "A Case for Waawaatesi"?

A
Silent Spring starts with a negative tone and ends with a positive tone, while “A Case for Waawaatesi” starts with a positive tone and ends with a positive tone.
B
Silent Spring mostly appeals to readers’ logic, while “A Case for Waawaatesi” appeals to readers’ ethos by establishing the author’s credibility.
C
Silent Spring starts with general statements and ends with specific statements, while “A Case for Waawaatesi” starts with specific statements and ends with general statements.
D
Silent Spring primarily utilizes emotional appeals to alert the reader of possible future danger, while the argument in “A Case for Waawaatesi” includes more use of logic and reason.

Did you find these answers helpful?